The little introduction below is necessary as a lead in to my first blog (of probably many blogs) on the connection of the US investment banks to the past and future consumption growth of the US and the rest of the world.
During our discussions about world consumption growth, I will examine various country groupings which, together comprise this growth. Most of these groups are controlled directly by the United States through interlocking organizations, (OECD, NATO, World Bank, IMF,....).
In addition, as of today, if the organizations mentioned in this paragraph are not directly controlled by the US, nearly all of them are heavily influenced by the US -- (WTO, EU, OAS, World Bank, IMF....).
However, mostly due to the "credit crisis" which is seen in the rest of the world to be primarily due to a breakdown of the much vaunted American banking system, and due to the economic rise of countries like the BRIC countries ( Brazil, Russia, India, China), new financial groupings are taking shape. Some of these country groupings which were previously more subservient to American economic theology are becoming restive (EU), and new economic ideas are emerging. Also, new intentionally "non American" blocs are being formed in Asia and Latin America.
The European Union (EU) is the most important political and economical group in the world, second only to the United States. The EU GDP is larger than the US GDP, but the "central government" political and financial control of the individual countries in the EU is much looser than the control the US Federal Government exercises over the individual American states. In addition, many members of the EU continue using their own currency (UK) while other countries (Germany, France, use a common currency, the Euro).
What does all this have to do with consumption growth and currencies and investment banks? The answer is virtually every industrial country is deeply in debt. Past growth has been fuelled by this debt. That debt is now affecting "normal" future growth.
The amount of debt is not clearly visible because investment banks have, particularly in the last decade, conspired with governments and wealthy individuals to create "financial instruments" which hide the true debt and risk of default, by moving large percentages of debt off publicly available balance sheets. These "credits" or "debts" are nearly invisible, and are linked in an impenetrable web, connected by financial "derivative instruments" spread across the banks of the world, most particularly the banks of the US, and the UK. Hence the "credit crisis" which has caused the western governments to pump trillions of taxpayer dollars into western banks
As the world economy slows down, these problems are beginning to surface in the smaller countries like Portugal, Ireland, Iceland, Greece and Spain, (the PIIGS). However the problem is not confined to the smaller countries. I will examine the larger countries (US, UK) as I dig into the factors which will hamper world growth.
Here is the article from Der Spiegel on Goldman Sachs and Greece:
Greeks aren't very welcome in the Rue Alphones Weicker in Luxembourg. It's home to Eurostat, the European Union's statistical office. The number crunchers there are deeply annoyed with Athens. Investigative reports state that important data "cannot be confirmed" or has been requested but "not received."
Creative accounting took priority when it came to totting up government debt.Since 1999, the Maastricht rules threaten to slap hefty fines on euro member countries that exceed the budget deficit limit of three percent of gross domestic product. Total government debt mustn't exceed 60 percent. The Greeks have never managed to stick to the 60 percent debt limit, and they only adhered to the three percent deficit ceiling with the help of blatant balance sheet cosmetics. One time, gigantic military expenditures were left out, and another time billions in hospital debt. After recalculating the figures, the experts at Eurostat consistently came up with the same results: In truth, the deficit each year has been far greater than the three percent limit. In 2009, it exploded to over 12 percent.
Now, though, it looks like the Greek figure jugglers have been even more brazen than was previously thought. "Around 2002 in particular, various investment banks offered complex financial products with which governments could push part of their liabilities into the future," one insider recalled, adding that Mediterranean countries had snapped up such products.
Greece's debt managers agreed a huge deal with the savvy bankers of US investment bank Goldman Sachs at the start of 2002. The deal involved so-called cross-currency swaps in which government debt issued in dollars and yen was swapped for euro debt for a certain period -- to be exchanged back into the original currencies at a later date.
Fictional Exchange Rates
Such transactions are part of normal government refinancing. Europe's governments obtain funds from investors around the world by issuing bonds in yen, dollar or Swiss francs. But they need euros to pay their daily bills. Years later the bonds are repaid in the original foreign denominations.
But in the Greek case the US bankers devised a special kind of swap with fictional exchange rates. That enabled Greece to receive a far higher sum than the actual euro market value of 10 billion dollars or yen. In that way Goldman Sachs secretly arranged additional credit of up to $1 billion for the Greeks.
This credit disguised as a swap didn't show up in the Greek debt statistics. Eurostat's reporting rules don't comprehensively record transactions involving financial derivatives. "The Maastricht rules can be circumvented quite legally through swaps," says a German derivatives dealer.
In previous years, Italy used a similar trick to mask its true debt with the help of a different US bank. In 2002 the Greek deficit amounted to 1.2 percent of GDP. After Eurostat reviewed the data in September 2004, the ratio had to be revised up to 3.7 percent. According to today's records, it stands at 5.2 percent.
At some point Greece will have to pay up for its swap transactions, and that will impact its deficit. The bond maturities range between 10 and 15 years. Goldman Sachs charged a hefty commission for the deal and sold the swaps on to a Greek bank in 2005.
The bank declined to comment on the controversial deal. The Greek Finance Ministry did not respond to a written request for comment.
No comments:
Post a Comment